Years in the making.
A process that engaged stakeholders in Oregon and Washington.
It all goes away. Why? Because everyone didn't agree. Because baseless fears drove a handful of people to object. Since when have we all agreed on everything that happens around here?
The proposed Lower Columbia National Heritage Area concept is dead.
I find this rapid reversal curious for a number of reasons. The draft feasibility study makes the case for the unique character of the region and it's serious contributions to American history. The study establishes a model for financial sustainability through (though controversial) an organization with a local track record for solid economic development projects.
You may remember the long battles over expansion of Fort Clatsop. NPS really wanted that one and actually moved staff managers around and lobbied congress until they made it happen. That in spite of very similar arguments against it and a clearly divided community that had to be won over.
This sudden decision after laying so much groundwork is just plain odd.
Comments expressed
From my perspective I would encourage more local/community reclamation projects the likes of Mill Pond Village, saving the second Flavel home, a true study for effective revitalization of downtown Astoria, Warrenton City core.
ReplyDeleteThe Lower Columbia's uniqueness of The Lewis and Clark National Park, sorry if not properly named, supplants a NHA in my view.
The argument they produce is lack of administration commitment and funds.
ReplyDeleteTHe real truth is more likely the recent examination of the NHA relationship with Shorebank Cascadia and it’s relatives. I do not agree with Shorebanks explanation as broadcast recently. Funds that were transferred need to be repaid and total disclosure from Shorebank is necessary.
At least some good news is still possible.